Medical Tourism Facilitator Contract: Who You Actually Sign With

LymyVoyage finding

Partially supported by the available data.

Quoted from each platform's own terms; whether a court would hold a platform liable is untested, and the Australian view is one law firm's reading.

You find a clinic abroad through a booking platform. A coordinator answers your questions, sends quotes and may take a deposit. But when the treatment goes wrong, who is your contract with?

Man reading a medical tourism platform's terms on a laptop to see what liability the agency accepts

The platforms' own terms answer that clearly: not them. We read the terms of five medical travel platforms. Each one says it is not a party to the treatment contract between you and the clinic. Three of them also cap what you can claim from the platform itself.

Five platforms' terms, side by side

PlatformParty to the treatment contract?Limit on the platform's own liabilityLaw named in the terms
BookimedNo; "not a representative of the Clinics"1Excludes damages from using the site, to the extent law allows1Portugal, "without prejudice to" consumer rights at home1
Medical Tourism AssociationNo; "not involved in the contractual relationship"2Limited to the fees it charged you2Florida, Palm Beach County2
Better by MTANo; "a direct contract is established between you and the Provider"3Limited to the fees paid to it for that treatment3Florida, Palm Beach County3
QunomedicalDescribes itself as "an intermediary and technical service provider"4Liable for intent and gross negligence; exclusions do not apply to harm to "life, body and health"4Berlin courts for patients outside the EU4
PlacidWayNo; not a party "merely because the parties met or communicated" on it5The greater of what you paid it in the past 12 months or $1005Colorado5

These are five platforms, chosen because their terms are public in English. They are not a sample of the whole industry.

What "not a party" means in the wording

Bookimed's terms say it "is not a representative of the Clinics and does not guarantee the quality of their services". They add that it is "not an intermediary between the patient and Medical Centers".1

The Medical Tourism Association, which runs a patient platform, goes further. Once a user and a provider agree a contract, it "is not involved in the contractual relationship" and "does not assume any rights, obligations or liabilities" from it.2

Better by MTA, its booking service, puts it in one line: on confirmation, "a direct contract is established between you and the Provider".3 It "facilitates the booking and payment process but is not a party to the contract".3

Deposits are where the line blurs

Several platforms handle money, which is where a patient might reasonably think the platform is more than a noticeboard.

  • Bookimed may take a confirmation deposit of 200 euros or dollars. Its terms describe this as "a payment for our services", which the clinic then deducts from the treatment price. It is refundable if you ask at least 10 days before the appointment.1
  • Better by MTA calls itself the "Merchant of Record" and processes refunds. But "any decision to refund rests solely with the Provider".3
  • The Medical Tourism Association lists, among its paid services, "secure payment due to Medical Tourism Association acting as a guarantor for any deposits".2
  • Qunomedical says it is not a payment agent or money recipient for any clinic. It is paid by the clinics, so its service is free to patients.4

So a platform can take your money and still not be the one that owes you the treatment.

When a platform can still answer for it

The terms are written by the platforms. Whether a court accepts them is a separate question, and the answer depends on the country.

Astris Law, an Australian law firm, sets out the position under the Australian Consumer Law. It says an agent booking for a named clinic is not a party to the treatment contract. But a business that "holds itself out as supplying the whole package risks being treated as the supplier of all of it, treatment included".6

The same firm says a term excluding an agent's own consumer guarantees is void under section 64 of that law.6 A clause choosing a foreign law does not keep the Australian law out on its own. It cites the case of Valve, a US company held to Australian consumer guarantees despite terms choosing Washington State law.6

The firm also notes that no reported Australian decision appears to have considered a medical tourism facilitator.6

The platforms' own terms leave room for this. PlacidWay's liability cap does not limit "non-waivable consumer rights".5 Bookimed's choice of Portuguese law is "without prejudice to any consumer rights provided by the laws of your country of residence".1

What the terms leave out

  • The treatment itself. Every set of terms points claims about care back to the clinic. PlacidWay says disputes over clinical care, malpractice and refunds owed by a provider "are primarily between the Patient and Provider".5
  • Whose law covers the clinic. For UK and EU patients, the home-law rule for consumer contracts does not apply when the service is supplied entirely in another country.7 Treatment in Istanbul is supplied in Istanbul. Our article on suing a clinic abroad covers which court can hear that claim.
  • The commission. Qunomedical says clinics pay it.4 Astris Law says marketing a service as independent can make silence about a commission misleading in Australia.6 Our article on facilitator commissions covers what they are typically paid.
  • Untested ground. The Australian position, as the law firm says, rests on general principle.6 We found no court decision on a medical tourism platform in the countries we checked.

How to use this before you book

Before paying anything, find the name of the clinic's legal entity on the quote. That is who you are contracting with for the treatment.

Ask the platform in writing what it is responsible for: the booking, the deposit, the translation, the transfers. Ask who decides a refund, and keep a dated copy of the platform's terms and its sales pages. If something goes wrong, those pages are what a lawyer will read first.

1 / 7

A platform found your clinic and took your deposit. Five platforms' terms all say they are not a party to your treatment contract. So who is?

Footnotes

  1. https://us-uk.bookimed.com/page/terms-of-service/ — Bookimed, "Terms of Service" (last updated Aug 2026). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. https://medicaltourismassociation.com/content/terms-and-conditions — Medical Tourism Association, "Terms and Conditions". Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  3. https://www.better.medicaltourism.com/better-by-mta-terms-service — Better by MTA (Medical Tourism Association), "Terms of Service" (effective Oct 4, 2024). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  4. https://www.qunomedical.com/en/terms-and-conditions — Qunomedical, "General Terms and Conditions". Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  5. https://www.placidway.com/termsconditions/ — PlacidWay, LLC, "PlacidWay Terms of Use" (modified Sep 8, 2026). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  6. https://www.astrislaw.com/article/medical-tourism-agents-australian-consumer-law.md — Astris Law (law firm, Brisbane), "Medical Tourism Agents and the Australian Consumer Law: Claims, Commissions and Booking Terms". Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  7. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2008/593/article/6 — Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I), Article 6(4)(a), as retained in UK law. Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

Evidence at a glanceMethodology

StatementSourceTierDateStatus
Bookimed's terms say it is not a representative of the clinics, does not guarantee their services, and is governed by Portuguese law without prejudice to home-country consumer rightsPlatform terms of service132026-08Approximate
The Medical Tourism Association says it is not involved in the contract between user and provider, assumes no rights, obligations or liabilities from it, and limits its liability to fees chargedPlatform terms and conditions232026-10Approximate
Better by MTA says a direct contract is formed between patient and provider, that it is not a party, that refund decisions rest solely with the provider, and caps its liability at fees paid for that treatmentPlatform terms of service332024-10Approximate
PlacidWay says it is not a party to the treatment contract and caps its liability at the greater of fees paid to it in 12 months or $100, without limiting non-waivable consumer rightsPlatform terms of use532026-09Approximate
All five platforms reviewed disclaim being a party to, or responsible for, the treatment contractCalculated by this publication
Derived from: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55
Count of the five platforms' terms that contain a not-a-party or intermediary-only clause.
3--Approximate
Under the Australian Consumer Law, a platform holding itself out as supplying the whole package risks being treated as the supplier of the treatment, and a term excluding its own guarantees is void; no reported decision has considered a medical tourism facilitatorLaw firm commentary632026Approximate
By Arthur Harmash7 min read

Reviewed by Arthur Harmash, October 30, 2026

Research compiled with AI assistance; facts and sources verified by Arthur Harmash.

Research & verification

We independently research information from publicly available sources. Claims are cross-checked against multiple sources where possible. When sources disagree, the disagreement is reported rather than resolved by assumption. LymyVoyage does not provide medical advice or make individual treatment recommendations.

Share:

Enjoyed this? Get more like it

Occasional emails, no spam -- just new articles as they're published.

More from Clinics & Providers

Man signing clinic forms at a reception desk, where a waiver not to sue may sit in the paperwork
Clinics & Providers

Waiver Not to Sue a Clinic Abroad: What Five Laws Say

The UK voids a waiver of liability for negligent injury, as do Hungary and, for gross fault, Turkey. Surgery abroad is usually judged by the clinic's own law.

8 min read
Traveller placing an implant card beside a passport in an airport security tray
Clinics & Providers

Implant Card: Breast and Hip Yes, Dental Implants Disputed

EU law requires an implant card for breast implants and hip replacements but exempts screws and crowns. Whether a dental implant counts as a screw is disputed.

9 min read
Gavel and file on a judge's bench in an empty courtroom, for suing a clinic abroad from home
Clinics & Providers

Can You Sue a Clinic Abroad From Home? Court and Law Clauses

Sue a clinic abroad from the UK or EU: a court clause may not stop it, but the clinic's law can still apply, and a home judgment must be enforced in Turkey.

8 min read

Comments

Loading comments…