Gastric Balloon Removed Early: Rates From 2% to 19%

LymyVoyage finding

Partially supported by the available data.

Each rate comes from an FDA summary or a peer-reviewed study, but they count different things (patient requests, intolerance only, the first three months), so they cannot rank the balloons against each other.

Gastric balloons are meant to stay in the stomach for four to twelve months, depending on the type.1234 Some come out within days. How often that happens depends on which balloon, which study, and what the study counted as an early removal.

Patient holding her stomach on a hospital bed as a nurse offers water, a reason a gastric balloon is removed early

The published rates run from about 2% to about 19%. They are not measuring the same thing. This article puts them on one table, explains why they differ, and asks who pays when a balloon fitted abroad has to come out ahead of schedule.

Early removal rates, by balloon and study

BalloonStudyPatientsRemoved earlyMain reasons
Orbera (6 months)US pivotal trial, FDA summary16018.8% (30)18 intolerance, 7 other adverse events, 15 patient request1
Spatz3 (adjustable, 8 months)US pivotal trial, FDA summary18716.6% (31)229 adverse events, 1 pregnancy, 1 relocation2
Adjustable balloons, mostly Spatz12 studies pooled4,9815.7% within 3 months5Intolerance and early removal counted together5
Orbera365 (12 months)UK clinic database1,14950 for intolerance, about 4.4%4Intolerance4
Orbera365, Elipse, Spatz3Singapore hospital, looking back5413.0% (7)6Intolerance6
Elipse, now Allurion (swallowed)6 studies pooled2,0132.3%7Pooled rate; 3 vomited up, 9 deflated early7
AllurionUS pivotal trial, FDA summary264No rate given in the text3185 of 261 went on to a second balloon3

One trial, two numbers

Orbera's US approval rests on one randomized trial. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) summary of that trial says 30 of 160 balloon patients, or 18.8%, had the balloon removed before six months.1 The trial's peer-reviewed report gives the same 18.8%.8

A news report of the same trial, written up from the presentation at a gastroenterology conference, gives 22%.9 It quotes the trial's presenter: "15 for symptoms and 13 at subject request." That is 28 removals.

The gap is the denominator. The FDA's 160 includes 35 practice cases, where doctors were trained on the device.1 Divide 28 by the 125 randomized patients alone and you get 22.4%. Both numbers describe the same trial. They just count different people.

Half of Orbera's early removals were not for a medical problem the investigator diagnosed. The FDA summary lists 15 of the 30 as "due to subject request", with "no additional information" on why.1

The adjustable balloon cut its own rate

The FDA summary of Spatz3's US trial reports 31 of 187 balloons removed early, or 16.6%.2 The FDA called this a "high removal rate" that "may impact patient's ability to fully benefit from use of the device."2

The number would have been higher without the adjustment, which is the feature that sets this balloon apart. Fifty patients asked for removal because of side effects. Twenty-eight of them had the balloon's volume turned down instead, and 21 of those finished the full eight months.2

A 2025 review pooled 12 studies of adjustable balloons, with 4,981 patients. It put intolerance and early removal within three months at 5.7%.5 That is about a third of the trial figure. It is not a like-for-like comparison, because pooled clinic studies and a tightly monitored FDA trial do not count removals the same way.

Why the swallowed balloon's number is lower

Allurion's balloon is swallowed as a capsule. After about four months it empties and passes on its own.3 So "early removal" means something different here, because there is no planned removal procedure to bring forward.

Allurion promotes a 2.3% early removal rate on its website.10 The figure comes from a 2020 review of six studies with 2,013 patients, published in Obesity Surgery.7 The same review recorded three balloons vomited up early and nine that deflated early.7

The FDA's own summary of Allurion's US trial, published in March 2026, does not state an early removal rate in its text.3 It reports something nearby: of 261 patients who started, 185 went on to receive the planned second balloon. That is 70.9%.3 The summary does not say why the rest did not.

Real clinics, smaller numbers

Outside FDA trials, the reported rates come in lower, though most of them count intolerance only. A UK clinic group followed 1,149 patients with a 12-month Orbera balloon between 2017 and 2021. Fifty needed removal because of intolerance,4 which works out to about 4.4%.

A Singapore hospital looked back at 54 patients treated between 2017 and 2022. Seven, or 13.0%, had the balloon taken out early for intolerance.6 Patients with anxiety or depression were more likely to be among them. The authors call the study small and "hypothesis-generating".6

The timing matters for anyone travelling. In the Singapore group, early removals came a mean of seven days after placement.6 In the Orbera trial, intolerance serious enough to count as a serious adverse event started a median of one day after placement.1

Who pays for the extra procedure

None of the trials price an early removal. Clinic listings rarely do either.

A medical-travel booking site lists one Turkish clinic's balloon package at $1,620. It notes that "a second visit for removal after 6 months incurs a separate fee of €400-500."11 That is the planned removal. The listing says nothing about an unplanned one.

If the clinic that fitted the balloon is a flight away, removal may happen somewhere else. One Dubai hospital group lists a removal-only package, for a balloon "already externally placed in your stomach (in different facility)", at 4,682 United Arab Emirates dirhams.12

What the headline numbers leave out

  • They count different things. Some rates include patient requests, some only intolerance, some only the first three months. The 18.8% and the 2.3% are not a fair head-to-head.
  • Trial patients are watched closely. A higher trial rate may partly reflect more reporting, not a worse balloon. The data here cannot separate the two.
  • Volume changes hide removals. Spatz3 avoided 21 removals by turning the balloon down,2 and every adjustment is another endoscopy.
  • The swallowed balloon has no published trial rate. Allurion's 2.3% comes from pooled studies, not from the FDA summary of its US trial.73

How to use these numbers

Ask the clinic which balloon it uses, then ask what happens if it has to come out in the first week, and get the answer in writing. It should say who does the removal, where, and whether the package price covers it.

If you will fly home within days of placement, ask how long the clinic wants you nearby. In the studies here, problems tended to show up in the first days.

1 / 6

In US approval trials, 18.8% of Orbera balloons and 16.6% of Spatz3 balloons came out early. Allurion advertises 2.3%. Is the swallowed one really that much easier?

Footnotes

  1. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf14/P140008B.pdf — US Food and Drug Administration, "Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: ORBERA Intragastric Balloon System, PMA P140008" (approved Aug 2015). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  2. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf19/P190012B.pdf — US Food and Drug Administration, "Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: Spatz3 Adjustable Balloon System, PMA P190012" (approved Oct 2021). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  3. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf25/P250023B.pdf — US Food and Drug Administration, "Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: Allurion Gastric Balloon System, PMA P250023" (notice of approval Mar 2026). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38038905/ — Wiggins T. et al., "Safety and Efficacy of 12-Month Intra-gastric Balloon: Series of over 1100 Patients", Obesity Surgery (published Dec 2023). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39947163/ — Xia C. et al., "The Efficacy and Safety of Adjustable Intragastric Balloon for Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Obesity Facts (published Feb 2025). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. https://annals.edu.sg/?p=33166 — Choo A. et al., "Predictors of early removal of intragastric balloon due to intolerance: Insights from a multiethnic Asian cohort", Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore (published Sep 2024). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-020-04522-3 — Vantanasiri K. et al., "The Efficacy and Safety of a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Obesity Surgery (published Sep 2020). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28017964/ — Courcoulas A. et al., "Intragastric balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial", International Journal of Obesity (published Dec 2016). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

  9. https://blogs.the-hospitalist.org/content/orbera-intragastric-balloon-approved-weight-loss-obese-adults — MDedge / The Hospitalist, "Orbera intragastric balloon approved for weight loss in obese adults", reporting the trial presentation at Digestive Disease Week. Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

  10. https://allurion.com/en/blog/efficacy-and-safety-procedureless-gastric-balloon-weight-loss-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis — Allurion, "Efficacy and safety of a procedureless gastric balloon for weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis" (manufacturer's blog relaying the 2020 review). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

  11. https://us-uk.bookimed.com/clinics/procedure=gastric-balloon/ — Bookimed, "Gastric balloon clinics" (medical-travel booking listing). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

  12. https://www.mediclinic.ae/en/corporate/stay/international-patients/mediclinic-international-patients-packages/bariatrics-and-weight-loss-packages.html — Mediclinic Middle East, "Bariatrics and weight loss packages" (international patient price list). Accessed Oct 29, 2026. ↩

Evidence at a glanceMethodology

StatementSourceTierDateStatus
30 of 160 Orbera patients (18.8%) in the US pivotal trial had the balloon removed before six months: 8 for device intolerance, 7 for other adverse events, 15 at the patient's requestFDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data112015-08Supported
A news report of the same Orbera trial gives a 22% early removal rate (28 removals); the FDA gives 18.8% because it counts 35 run-in cases in the denominatorMedical news report of a conference presentation3 (Archived copy)42015Disputed
31 of 187 Spatz3 patients (16.6%) in the US pivotal trial had the balloon removed early; 21 more avoided removal after a downward volume adjustmentFDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data412021-10Approximate
Pooled intolerance and early removal within three months for adjustable balloons was 5.7% across 12 studies and 4,981 patientsPeer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis512025-02Approximate
The pooled early removal rate for the swallowed Elipse (Allurion) balloon was 2.3% across six studies and 2,013 patientsPeer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis612020-09Approximate
The FDA summary of Allurion's US pivotal trial states no early removal rate in its text; 185 of 261 patients (70.9%) received the planned second balloonFDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data812026-03Approximate
About 4.4% of 1,149 UK patients with a 12-month Orbera balloon needed removal for intoleranceCalculated by this publication from a peer-reviewed case series
Derived from: 19
50 intolerance removals divided by 1,149 patients, both as stated in the study abstract.
12023-12Approximate
7 of 54 patients (13.0%) at a Singapore hospital had the balloon removed early for intolerance, a mean of seven days after placementPeer-reviewed retrospective cohort study10 (Archived copy)12024-09Approximate
A Turkish clinic listed on a booking site charges a separate EUR 400-500 for the planned removal visit after six months, on a USD 1,620 packageMedical-travel booking site listing11 (Archived copy)32026-10Approximate
By Arthur Harmash8 min read

Reviewed by Arthur Harmash, October 29, 2026

Research compiled with AI assistance; facts and sources verified by Arthur Harmash.

Research & verification

We independently research information from publicly available sources. Claims are cross-checked against multiple sources where possible. When sources disagree, the disagreement is reported rather than resolved by assumption. LymyVoyage does not provide medical advice or make individual treatment recommendations.

Share:

Enjoyed this? Get more like it

Occasional emails, no spam -- just new articles as they're published.

More from Treatment Types

Man in a beanie at an Istanbul hotel desk reading his clinic's hair transplant warranty certificate
Treatment Types

Hair Transplant Guarantee: What Turkish Clinics Actually Promise

One Turkish clinic redoes grafts only if under 80% grow by month 15, and lists 18 ways to void it. Another promises 98% for life but publishes no terms.

7 min read
Plastic surgeon showing a sealed breast implant package to a patient, whose warranty terms depend on where it is fitted
Treatment Types

Breast Implant Warranty Abroad: Whose Terms Apply?

Motiva's US warranty covers implants fitted in the US or Puerto Rico, and a surgeon files the claim. We found no published terms for Turkey or Mexico.

7 min read
Technician lifting donor sperm samples from a liquid nitrogen tank at a sperm bank, where a sperm donation limit applies
Treatment Types

Sperm Donor Limit: Spain 6, UK 10, a Danish Bank 75 Worldwide

Spain caps a donor at six children and the UK at ten families, but only at home. A Danish bank allows 75 families worldwide. ESHRE proposes an EU cap of 50.

7 min read

Comments

Loading comments…